Monday, September 19, 2005
From my inbox....
Need a place to send that manuscript of non-results lying dormant in your bottom drawer? Try
I wonder, what would Munger think? Would a publication in the Journal of Spurious Correlation be better than no publication at all?
posted by Michelle @ 11:38 AM,
- At 9/19/2005 8:20 PM, PRB said...
There's a Popperian science of Michelle Dionism? Creepy.
I'm still thinking about what journal should receive my never-completed article on polling the dead.
- At 9/19/2005 9:19 PM, Michelle said...
Silly rabbit, I meant that political science is a Popperian social science....not that I'm a Popperian social scientist.
- At 9/20/2005 9:14 AM, PRB said...
Actually, what you said is that you were a Popperian social science (unto yourself?).
And I want my Trix!
- At 9/20/2005 10:22 AM, Michelle said...
And who said blogs weren't peer reviewed?
Is the above edit any better?
- At 9/20/2005 7:07 PM, PRB said...
Sure. Not that I had anything against Popper in the first place.
- At 9/20/2005 7:49 PM, Chris Lawrence said...
My Spanish is rusty (ok, nonexistent), but I'm pretty sure that link has nothing to do with a peer-reviewed journal.
And... a pub is a pub is a pub, at least in my book (and, for that matter, in the books of most people at BA/MA institutions... the Research I rat race is for the birds, IMHO).
- At 9/21/2005 8:55 AM, Michelle said...
Thanks for the correction. That post had problems all around...guess it's a sign of how busy I have been.
Here's the real link that arrived in my inbox.